Samsung Z Flip 5 vs. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: A Comprehensive Comparison

"Foldable smartphone face-off! Discover the Samsung Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features, performance, and more in our detailed comparison."


Welcome to! Today, we’ll dive into a detailed comparison between two revolutionary foldable smartphones: the Samsung Z Flip 5 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. These cutting-edge devices have taken the smartphone market by storm with their unique folding designs and top-of-the-line features. We’ll explore their specifications, design, performance, camera capabilities, and more to help you decide which one suits your needs best.

Design and Build

Both the Z Flip 5 and Razr 40 Ultra feature folding designs, allowing them to transform from compact to larger displays. The Z Flip 5 sports a Plastic front, Gorilla Glass Victus 2 back, and an aluminum frame, while the Razr 40 Ultra boasts a Plastic front, Gorilla Glass Victus front (when closed), and Gorilla Glass Victus back with a sturdy aluminum frame (7000 series). Additionally, the Razr 40 Ultra offers a water-repellent coating, enhancing its durability. Both devices exude a premium feel, but the Razr 40 Ultra edges slightly ahead in terms of build and ruggedness.

Broadly speaking, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra have the same design. Both are clamshell phones, offering a regular smartphone form factor that folds in half for easy portability.

Their dimensions are similar too, although the Motorola’s 0.2-inch larger screen means it reaches fractionally further in all dimensions (saved for thickness when closed, which is the same across both phones at 15.1mm). The Razr 40 Ultra distinguished itself from the Flip 4 by offering a completely flush folding mechanism, but that advantage went away with the Flip 5’s revised ‘waterdrop’ hinge design.

That system should also even things out in terms of the display crease. Motorola won a lot of fans with its smaller dip, but the Flip 5 looks to follow suit.

We’ll talk about displays in more detail in the next bit, but there’s an important design angle with these external displays. While the Razr 40 Ultra swallows up that dual camera module with its outer panel, Samsung shaved the corner off at an angle to avoid doing so, giving it an L-shaped appearance. We’ll have to say right off the bat that Motorola’s approach is preferable.

That’s not a criticism, as Samsung’s classy, professional-looking colorways have been a highlight of the Flip range since its inception. Even so, the Razr 40 Ultra will certainly appear more ‘fun’ to certain types of users.

The Flip 5 comes with an IPX8 rating and an uncertified degree of dust resistance too, while the Razr 40 Ultra has an IP52 rating. This means the Flip has better water resistance, while the Razr wins on dust resistance.


The display is a critical component of any smartphone, and in the case of the Samsung Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, it’s even more special due to their innovative folding designs. Both phones feature foldable AMOLED displays, providing users with the ability to transform their devices from compact to larger screens.

The Samsung Z Flip 5 boasts a 6.7-inch Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, offering a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and animations. The HDR10+ support ensures vibrant colors and excellent contrast, resulting in a captivating viewing experience. Additionally, the Z Flip 5 features a cover display on the outside when folded, providing quick access to notifications and basic tasks without needing to open the device fully.

Samsung Z Flip 5
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

On the other hand, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra takes display technology a step further with its 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED screen. It offers an impressive 165Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Z Flip 5 in fluidity during gaming and multimedia consumption. HDR10+ support enhances the visual quality, allowing for vivid and true-to-life colors. The Razr 40 Ultra also includes a second external AMOLED display, providing useful information and notifications when the phone is closed.

Both devices deliver stunning visuals with high pixel densities, making images and text sharp and clear. Whether you’re watching videos, browsing the web, or playing games, the foldable displays on the Z Flip 5 and Razr 40 Ultra promise an immersive and futuristic experience.

Performance and Hardware

Under the hood, the Z Flip 5 houses a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset with an Octa-core processor, while the Razr 40 Ultra incorporates a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset with a similar Octa-core setup. Both devices perform admirably, with the Z Flip 5 earning slightly higher benchmark scores in Antutu and Geekbench tests. However, the difference in real-world performance is negligible, and both devices handle multitasking and gaming with ease.

Memory and Storage

When it comes to memory and storage options, the Z Flip 5 offers two variants: 256GB of storage with 8GB RAM or 512GB of storage with 8GB RAM. The Razr 40 Ultra also offers two options: 256GB of storage with 8GB RAM or 512GB of storage with 12GB RAM. Both devices use fast UFS storage technology, ensuring smooth app launches and data transfers. If you require more RAM for heavy multitasking, the Razr 40 Ultra’s 12GB variant might be the better choice.

Camera Capabilities

The camera setups on these foldable smartphones are impressive, but the Z Flip 5 and Razr 40 Ultra take slightly different approaches. The Z Flip 5 features a dual-camera system with a 12MP wide and a 12MP ultrawide lens, while the Razr 40 Ultra boasts a 12MP wide and a 13MP ultrawide lens. In daylight conditions, both devices capture stunning photos with excellent detail and color accuracy. The Razr 40 Ultra performs slightly better in low-light scenarios due to its wider aperture. For selfie enthusiasts, the Razr 40 Ultra’s 32MP front camera delivers more detailed and vibrant selfies compared to the Z Flip 5’s 10MP front shooter.

Camera Samples

Connectivity and Features

Both devices come with essential connectivity options like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC. The Z Flip 5 stands out with its IPX8 water resistance rating and Samsung Pay support, making it a better choice for users seeking extra durability and contactless payments.

Battery Life

In the battery department, the Razr 40 Ultra has a slight edge, packing a 3800 mAh battery compared to the Z Flip 5’s 3700 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging, but the Razr 40 Ultra offers a higher 30W wired charging rate, while the Z Flip 5 tops at 25W. The Z Flip 5 features 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging (4.5W), while the Razr 40 Ultra offers 5W wireless charging.

Explore More:- Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Retro Edition


In conclusion, both the Samsung Z Flip 5 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are fantastic foldable smartphones that offer unique designs and top-tier performance. If you prioritize a larger display and superior camera capabilities, the Razr 40 Ultra is the better choice. On the other hand, if you value water resistance, a slightly more compact design, and the convenience of Samsung Pay, the Z Flip 5 will not disappoint. Assess your needs and preferences carefully before making your decision. Whichever device you choose, you’re bound to experience the cutting-edge technology that foldable smartphones bring to the table. Happy smartphone shopping!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top